But in the words of another US oil company executive, "it all turned out a lot more complicated than anyone had expected". Instead of the anticipated post-invasion rapid expansion of Iraqi production (an expectation of an additional 2m b/d entering the world market by now), the continuing violence of the insurgency has prevented Iraqi exports from even recovering to pre-invasion levels.And you are seeing them now, like it or not. Coffins and amputees coming back, gasoline at $2.50 a gallon, and no end in sight. Of course, does your mainstream media link this all together for you, or even acknowledge the war in Iraq? Not bloody likely, what with such essential news as Charles and Camilla's wedding, Michael Jackson, and the most ghoulish deathwatch over the Pope since, well, Terri Schiavo the week before.
In short, the US appears to have fought a war for oil in the Middle East, and lost it. The consequences of that defeat are now plain for all to see.
What disturbs me even more is when I look at my students, almost none of whom have any awareness of how vulnerable they are becoming to an imminent draft, which will place many of them under the direct control of the most corrupt and incompetent administration in my lifetime, and that's over five decades. We are facing disaster and turning our heads away, hoping it will just go away. It's time for action, folks, to get rid of these crooks and liars and warmongers and fascists and hatemongers and their compliant enablers as well. It will take a kind of revolution to clean these shit-filled houses of shame. I just hope that there is something worth salvaging before it's too late. I do love my country, but the people running it have turned it into a whorehouse for the corporate and the wealthy. The people hold the power, but just as there is little difference between someone who doesn't read and someone who can't read, those who don't exercise the political power they do have are, in fact, as powerless as the most downtrodden in any dictatorship.
9 comments:
Moron, that is a letter to the editor of FT, not an article or an editorial.
To the previous Anonymous poster:
Dr Ian Rutledge has got a PhD in economics, and is probably a lot smarter than you are.
If I coulda said it as well, I would have. Thank you , Olaf.
I have 20-year old twins, a girl and a boy. I believe they have an abiding "awareness of how vulnerable they are becoming to an imminent draft, which will place many of them [and their peers] under the direct control of the most corrupt and incompetent administration" in MY lifetime. But their sweet, puny little voices cannot override the greed and panic of the American people.
Any comment that starts with "Moron" is simple projection. Glad to give him/her an outlet for his/her (no gender-specific aspersions here) spleen venting. As far as the origin of Dr. Rutledge's piece, what he says is what is critical, not the way it was presented. Try directing your foamy vehemence toward those whose distortions and misrepresentations have consequences that are truly tragic.
Thanks for the support! Nice to know someone is reading this occasionally.
Yes, Dr. Rutlege's comments are incisive and important. However, the misattribution is sloppy and disingenuous. You want to say, "Even the esteemed, conservative FT agrees with me." Well, they don't; one of their readers does. What's worse is that Salon's Daou Report editors chose to highlight this section of your post, apparently happy, if not eager, to perpetuate, uncritically, the assertion about the FT.
Okay, well, I screwed up. As my profile says, I am not now, nor have I ever been a journalist. That's my excuse. I'm just a schucky citizen venting in a blog.
When Brit Hume or Howard Kurtz screw up in a national forum, what's their excuse? Professional journalists, my ass.
To all anonymous commenters, thanks for pointing out my error. I have posted a correction on the blog. My apologies.
Post a Comment