"Principiis obsta; Finem respice." Olaf Rotkohl thinks that the pursuit of power over others is in itself a corruption, and those who seek such power are fundamentally corrupt. This space is dedicated as part of the constant challenge to those who seek to wield authority over the rest of us, keeping them on notice that they exert power only as it is granted to them by the people.
Monday, July 30, 2007
Well, I'm Runnin'/Police on my Back...
My buddies invited me out the other night to go clubbing, but I was hardly prepared for what they had in mind. Jeezus! What happened to Officer Friendly?
In Soviet USA...
These jokes used to be funny. You know, "In Soviet Russia, television watches you!" Or "In Soviet Russia, hamburger eats you!" "In Soviet Russia, car drives you!" You get the idea.
But with the White House and Congressional repugs trying to shove a FISA-free, warrantless snooping bill through again, this collection of jokes may well be back in fashion--in this country. Among the Bush/Cheney crime sydicate this is just one of many impeachable offenses, but it is likely the most corrosive of all the others, because it pulls aside the last compulsory oversight on protection of the privacy of the citizenry. Certainly, absolutely, wiretaps, email captures, bugging, any and all communications intercept should be used against suspected targets, but first (or even subsequent to the act, as allowed by law in emergencies), a duly-appointed court must ensure that some evidence exists for the warrant.
So in the interest of lightening things up, send me your favorite examples of this gag. It starts with, "In Soviet America..."
But with the White House and Congressional repugs trying to shove a FISA-free, warrantless snooping bill through again, this collection of jokes may well be back in fashion--in this country. Among the Bush/Cheney crime sydicate this is just one of many impeachable offenses, but it is likely the most corrosive of all the others, because it pulls aside the last compulsory oversight on protection of the privacy of the citizenry. Certainly, absolutely, wiretaps, email captures, bugging, any and all communications intercept should be used against suspected targets, but first (or even subsequent to the act, as allowed by law in emergencies), a duly-appointed court must ensure that some evidence exists for the warrant.
So in the interest of lightening things up, send me your favorite examples of this gag. It starts with, "In Soviet America..."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)