The Connecticut case affords a rare glimpse of an exponentially growing practice of domestic surveillance under the USA Patriot Act, which marked its fourth anniversary on Oct. 26. "National security letters," created in the 1970s for espionage and terrorism investigations, originated as narrow exceptions in consumer privacy law, enabling the FBI to review in secret the customer records of suspected foreign agents. The Patriot Act, and Bush administration guidelines for its use, transformed those letters by permitting clandestine scrutiny of U.S. residents and visitors who are not alleged to be terrorists or spies.But wait, you protest. The courts require certain standards of suspicion be met, right? Oh, you are so, so very naive. Remember that this is a government run by liars, thieves, murderers, war profiteers, and totalitarians.
The FBI now issues more than 30,000 national security letters a year, according to government sources, a hundredfold increase over historic norms. The letters -- one of which can be used to sweep up the records of many people -- are extending the bureau's reach as never before into the telephone calls, correspondence and financial lives of ordinary Americans.
ssued by FBI field supervisors, national security letters do not need the imprimatur of a prosecutor, grand jury or judge. They receive no review after the fact by the Justice Department or Congress. The executive branch maintains only statistics, which are incomplete and confined to classified reports. The Bush administration defeated legislation and a lawsuit to require a public accounting, and has offered no example in which the use of a national security letter helped disrupt a terrorist plot.Oh yes, I forgot to mention that they are also horribly incompetent--the Chimpettes have no proof that it even works!
You see, these are motherfuckers who want power. That's it. They are not concerned with security or the rule of law or the protection of the citizenry. What other conclusion can one draw from the insistence on a practice that is unproductive, anti-American, and in fact ties up valuable investigative resources that should actually be looking for dangerous people with evil designs on our nation.
Here's a tip: 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington D.C. Any cabbie can take you there.
4 comments:
What is your view on the likelihood of the Patriot Act (God I love that title) being renewed?
I don't know. A lot of Dems who chickenshitted out and voted for it will flip now that the tide is turning, but don't underestimate the forces of oppression when it comes to trying to scare the public at a key moment to get renewal. It seemed bizarre that that nut Sen. Tom Coburn from Oklahoma was arguing in favor of sunset provisions for the Patriot Act last Sunday, but he was. Hell, maybe they'll repeal the whole thing. Are you aware of any proof that it has helped deter or catch a single terrorist?
I can't think of any way to put a negative or cynical spin on the Democratic victories in the New Jersey and Virginia gubernatorial races. Yikes! Am I becoming a simpering Olaf maquette?
Could be. The big question is, did the Chimpettes stay home in their bunkers and not vote, or have the lefties finally gotten off their asses and made it to the polls, or have the moderates finally been bludgeoned by enough bad news about Chimpie and the other criminals that they have switched sides?
Here's looking to 2006.
Post a Comment