Friday, May 20, 2005

Does This Make You Feel Proud?

Remember when Rush Limbaugh claimed that the abuses at Abu Ghraib were nothing more than the equivalent of fraternity hazings? I defy that fat, lying, morally bankrupt, anal-cyst-picking, drug addicted fuckwad to read this and claim that it's just the equivalent of fraternity hazing. And tell the Hillbilly Heroin Homeboy that it's not leftie propaganda; it's extracted from a 2000-page Army report, dig? Here's a sample that makes me, as a veteran, physically ill.
One captain nicknamed members of the Third Platoon "the Testosterone Gang." Several were devout bodybuilders. Upon arriving in Afghanistan, a group of the soldiers decorated their tent with a Confederate flag, one soldier said.

Some of the same M.P.'s took a particular interest in an emotionally disturbed Afghan detainee who was known to eat his feces and mutilate himself with concertina wire. The soldiers kneed the man repeatedly in the legs and, at one point, chained him with his arms straight up in the air, Specialist Callaway told investigators. They also nicknamed him "Timmy," after a disabled child in the animated television series "South Park." One of the guards who beat the prisoner also taught him to screech like the cartoon character, Specialist Callaway said.

Eventually, the man was sent home.
And I don't buy the Pentagon's bullshit that these are rogue warriors. This shit has official sanction, heavily implied when not explicitly ordered. That's how criminal regimes operate. One of the legacies of the Stalin regime is that Old Joe never actually signed a death warrant or any order explicitly calling for the death or imprisonment of enemies. His subordinates understood what they'd better do . . . or else. Since the Bushits are known for their extreme adherence to loyalty above everything else, what might be the likely outcome from El Presidente's utterances about prisoner treatment?
The platoon had the standard interrogations guide, Army Field Manual 34-52, and an order from the secretary of defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld, to treat prisoners "humanely," and when possible, in accordance with the Geneva Conventions. But with President Bush's final determination in February 2002 that the Conventions did not apply to the conflict with Al Qaeda and that Taliban fighters would not be accorded the rights of prisoners of war, the interrogators believed they "could deviate slightly from the rules," said one of the Utah reservists, Sgt. James A. Leahy.

"There was the Geneva Conventions for enemy prisoners of war, but nothing for terrorists," Sergeant Leahy told Army investigators. And the detainees, senior intelligence officers said, were to be considered terrorists until proved otherwise.
Voila! Bush is responsible for what happens under his watch, especially if his personal determination empowers his subordinates to commit war crimes.

He's bought himself and his cronies a ticket to the Hague as far as I am concerned.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Only if, Olaf. Honestly, I think that the other world powers that could drag these criminals into the Hague (such as European countries) are keeping their heads down. They know the score: the current administration is populated with sadists and antisocial personalities, and Americans seem fine with that. Why bother? Keep your head down, watch and wait.

Olaf said...

I agree, but it isn't the Europeans' responsibility but our own. I can only hope that the people are waking up. Bush's ratings are falling rapidly and it seems as if the lying doesn't work anymore. If the Senate and House can be reclaimed by Dems with guts in 2006, we might just see an impeachment proceeding. Keeping my fingers crossed. Thanks for reading and commenting. It gives me great hope!

Anonymous said...

Hey Olaf. When I read this article, I kept wavering between feeling physically ill and having involuntary tears come to my eyes. It is amazing and incredibly disturbing to me that the dehumanization of others is so systematic and institutionalized in our society and apparently, particularly in the military. What astounded me the most, however, was that I saw absolutely no TV news coverage of this story. After I read it in the NYT, I found it so powerful and disturbing that I just assumed it would be the talk of mainstream news. However, all I got from my CNN (which I admittedly watch only for masochistic reasons) was updates on Michael Jackson and the Runaway Bride. Typical. I agree that those in the highest levels of the administration are responsible for what is going on in Iraq and Afganistan, but if our media doesn't get their shit together and actually report the news, they will continue to get away with whatever they want while, at the same time, contratulating themselves for spreading "freedom and liberty." I am most definitely not proud to be an American right now!